Leading us up the garden path
Wayne Aspland | 14 October 2009
Crunch! is a new column looking at the numbers behind advertising and local search. In today’s Crunch!… Defining what a click is. That’s easy. Defining what a click isn’t. That’s harder… but much more important.
In the 12 years I’ve been working in online media, there’s one thing that’s always befuddled me.
It’s the fact that online marketers cite measurement as the biggest barrier to advertising on what is touted as the world’s most measurable medium.
Go figure!
To highlight this, a 2007 McKinsey Quarterly report* found that over 50% of Internet advertisers saw “insufficient metrics to measure impact” as a barrier to using or considering digital advertising.
And there’ve been similar surveys, with similar results, in Australia.
So, what’s going on here? How the hell can measuring such a measurable medium raise so much angst?
I’ve long thought there’s two reasons.
The first is confusion about how we’re measuring – in other words the different public measurement services and their methodologies. For quite a while now, there’s been concern in Australia about the accuracy of online statistics. Naturally, when there’s a lack of faith in the source, there’s going to be a lack of faith in the data as well.
The second is a lack of clarity around what we’re measuring. Just think about the simple issue of online traffic as an example. Over the years, we’ve been stumped by a blinding array of different metrics – hits, page views, sessions, visits, unique users and unique visitors just to start with.
These metrics all mean slightly different things but, despite that, they’re often quoted interchangeably: a recipe for much pulling-of-hair and gnashing-of-teeth if I ever saw one.
This metric malaise is a really big problem, and I wanted to touch on it today with a focus on one particular metric – the humble click.
WHAT’S A CLICK?
The other day, an interesting question was raised at a customer panel session I attended.
On the surface, the question – “what (in advertising terms) is a click?” – would seem pretty straightforward.
Put simply, it’s when a person clicks from a feeder – like a search engine or banner ad – to a particular advertiser’s web site. It’s the action that gives rise to pricing terms like ‘cost per click’ and ‘pay per click’.
Okay, no biggie there.
CLICKS AIN’T LEADS
But the question becomes a lot murkier when you think about what a click isn’t. In particular, whether a click and a lead are the same thing.
Now, this might seem like nit-picking, but it’s a really important question – especially for the numerically-obsessed, like me. It gets to the heart of how you understand, measure and evaluate the contribution of different media to your business.
To start with, let’s think about this in a traditional media context.
Let’s say you send out a DM piece to 1,000 potential customers. As a result, 100 people take a moment to read it and 10 are so enamoured with what you’ve said that they give you a call.
What have you got there? 1,000 leads? 100 leads? 10 leads?
If you’re a media outlet trying to justify your existence, you might say 100. You might even say 1,000 if you’re feeling particularly hairy-chested (and/or deluded).
But if you’re a manager trying to get a handle on your sales pipeline, the answer is unequivocal… 10.
A lead isn’t a passing ship; it’s a real potential customer who has called, emailed, visited or contacted you in some way expressing a real interest.
A lead is a real sales opportunity that – most critically – you have a real chance to close.
Don’t get me wrong. The fact that 100 people read your DM piece (or clicked through to your web site) is great. They now know you and have you in the back of their minds. They’ve interacted with your brand.
But those people don’t qualify as ‘leads’ until they take that next step and get in touch with you.
BRINGING CONVERSION INTO THE MIX
Clearly, you can’t properly equate clicks to leads (which take the form of calls, visits, emails and other forms of enquiry) in the way some try to do these days.
To properly measure the leads generated by online advertising, you need to bring another ratio into play – conversion.
Conversion measures how many people actually took that next step of contacting you.
Most research suggests that online conversion rates are quite low – in the low single digits. That means the actual leads stemming from your online advertising may only be a relatively small fraction of the number of clicks.
THE BOTTOM LINE
So, what’s the bottom line here?
Firstly, comparing clicks with leads ain’t comparing apples with apples. If you want to compare clicks generated by one form of advertising with calls or visits generated by another, you need to think about the conversion as well. How many people actually visited your site and then contacted you?
Secondly, think about how well your web site converts browsers to buyers. Optimising online lead-generation campaigns means not just getting lots of people to your site, but having a site that efficiently converts them to leads as well.
And finally, if someone comes to you offering a mountain of ‘leads’, ask them precisely what they mean by the word ‘leads’.
How many of them will be real leads – enquiries from potential customers that you have a chance to close?
You might just find they’re leading you up the garden path.
* How companies are marketing online: A McKinsey Global Survey. September 2007







